Evans v. Smith
111 S.E. 76, 28 Ga. App. 313, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 474
Opinion
1. A declaration filed upon an attachment will proceed as at common law, although the attachment itself and the levy made thereunder be dismissed. See Busby v. Elliott, 22 Ga. App. 392 (95 S. E. 1014).
2. The evidence demanded a verdict for the plaintiff, and it was not error for the court to direct the jury to find such a verdict. The several assignments of error are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Evans v. Smith, 111 S.E. 76, 28 Ga. App. 313, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 474 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
111 S.E. 76 (Evans v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Busby & Son v. Elliott
95 S.E. 1014 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Hopson v. Stuart Lumber Co.
95 S.E. 1015 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)