Evans v. Smith
This text of 111 S.E. 76 (Evans v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A declaration filed upon an attachment will proceed as at common law, although the attachment itself and the levy made thereunder be dismissed. See Busby v. Elliott, 22 Ga. App. 392 (95 S. E. 1014).
2. The evidence demanded a verdict for the plaintiff, and it was not error for the court to direct the jury to find such a verdict. The several assignments of error are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 S.E. 76, 28 Ga. App. 313, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-smith-gactapp-1922.