Evans v. Smith

111 S.E. 76, 28 Ga. App. 313, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 474
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1922
Docket13070
StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 76 (Evans v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Smith, 111 S.E. 76, 28 Ga. App. 313, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 474 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. A declaration filed upon an attachment will proceed as at common law, although the attachment itself and the levy made thereunder be dismissed. See Busby v. Elliott, 22 Ga. App. 392 (95 S. E. 1014).

2. The evidence demanded a verdict for the plaintiff, and it was not error for the court to direct the jury to find such a verdict. The several assignments of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J, and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Busby & Son v. Elliott
95 S.E. 1014 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Hopson v. Stuart Lumber Co.
95 S.E. 1015 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 76, 28 Ga. App. 313, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-smith-gactapp-1922.