Evans v. Roberts

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJune 28, 2010
DocketCivil Action No. 2010-1085
StatusPublished

This text of Evans v. Roberts (Evans v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Roberts, (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUN 282010 Clerk us' Senk . . DIstrict and rUPtcy COurts Raymond Curtis Evans, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 1t IV8fl Richard W. Roberts, Judge, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter, transferred from the United States District Court for the Middle District of

Pennsylvania, is before the Court on review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to

proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal ofa prisoner's complaint upon a

determination that the complaint, among other grounds, fails to state a claim upon which relief

can be granted).

Plaintiff is a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania. He

sues District Judge Richard W. Roberts of this Court for dismissing his case. See Evans v.

Daniels, Civ. Action No. 2123 (RWR). Plaintiff seeks a judgment "declaring defs final order

invalid." CompI. at 5. Plaintiff correctly appealed the dismissal order, albeit without success.

He has no further recourse in this Court. A separate Order of dismissal for failure to state a claim

accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

,..,- Date: June~ ,2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Evans v. Roberts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-roberts-dcd-2010.