Evans v. Rivera

252 A.D.2d 706, 675 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8200
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 9, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 252 A.D.2d 706 (Evans v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Rivera, 252 A.D.2d 706, 675 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules that prohibit encouraging others to participate in a work stoppage, disobeying a direct order and inflicting bodily harm on himself. Following an administrative appeal, the charge of inflicting harm was dismissed.

According to the misbehavior report which was authored by a correction officer who witnessed petitioner’s conduct, petitioner refused to move logs and encouraged others to do the same until gloves were issued. Only after receiving three direct orders to start working did petitioner do so. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence to support the charges against him (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964). Petitioner’s denial of the charges merely presented a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Mendez v Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 246 AD2d 702). Even if petitioner’s remaining contentions were preserved for our review— including his claim of Hearing Officer bias — we would find them to be lacking in merit.

Mercure, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freire v. Goord
1 A.D.2d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Biggs v. Goord
308 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Alejandro v. Goord
278 A.D.2d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Wilson v. Selsky
264 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Dunham v. Goord
254 A.D.2d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D.2d 706, 675 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-rivera-nyappdiv-1998.