Evans v. Ramunno
This text of Evans v. Ramunno (Evans v. Ramunno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
LOUISE EVANS, § § Petitioner Below, § No. 182, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § VINCENT RAMUNNO, § C.A. No. N18M-09-110 § Petitioner Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: May 24, 2019 Decided: May 24, 2019
ORDER
The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, by certified mail, directing the
appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for the Court’s lack
of jurisdiction to consider an appeal from a decision issued by a Superior Court
Commissioner. On May 13, 2019, the Court received the certified mail receipt
indicating that the appellant had received the notice to show cause. The appellant
has not responded to the notice within the required ten-day period. For that reason,
dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)
and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Evans v. Ramunno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-ramunno-del-2019.