Evans v. Oregon State Penitentiary

773 P.2d 1365, 96 Or. App. 743
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Evans v. Oregon State Penitentiary. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 Or. App. 514
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 24, 1989·No. 11-87-187, 11-87-291, 11-87-297, 11-87-303; (CA A47020, A47021, A47022, A47023·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this consolidated appeal, petitioner seeks review of four final orders of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, each finding that he had violated a disciplinary rule. He first contends that various constitutional rights were violated, because the two hearings from which the four orders resulted were held in his absence. However, there is evidence to support the hearings officer’s conclusion that he had waived his right to appear. OAR 291-105-056(2).

Petitioner next contends that a $25 fine imposed in one order and a $100 fine in another order are unlawful. We agree. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fines vacated in CA A47021 and CA A47023; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 773 P.2d 1365, 96 Or. App. 743 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

773 P.2d 1365 (Evans v. Oregon State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. Oregon State Penitentiary
750 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)