Evans v. Oregon State Penitentiary

773 P.2d 1365, 96 Or. App. 743
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 24, 1989
Docket11-87-187, 11-87-291, 11-87-297, 11-87-303; (CA A47020, A47021, A47022, A47023
StatusPublished

This text of 773 P.2d 1365 (Evans v. Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 773 P.2d 1365, 96 Or. App. 743 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this consolidated appeal, petitioner seeks review of four final orders of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, each finding that he had violated a disciplinary rule. He first contends that various constitutional rights were violated, because the two hearings from which the four orders resulted were held in his absence. However, there is evidence to support the hearings officer’s conclusion that he had waived his right to appear. OAR 291-105-056(2).

Petitioner next contends that a $25 fine imposed in one order and a $100 fine in another order are unlawful. We agree. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fines vacated in CA A47021 and CA A47023; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. Oregon State Penitentiary
750 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
773 P.2d 1365, 96 Or. App. 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-oregon-state-penitentiary-orctapp-1989.