Evans v. N Street Boxing Club

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 4, 2002
Docket01-30958
StatusUnpublished

This text of Evans v. N Street Boxing Club (Evans v. N Street Boxing Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. N Street Boxing Club, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30958

Summary Calendar

CHARLES LOUIS EVANS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NORTH STREET BOXING CLUB INC.; BEN D. JOHNSON, in his official capacity as an officer or director of North Street Boxing Club Inc.; BILLY L. WEST, JR., in his official capacity as Secretary and interim President of the Board of Directors of North Street Boxing Club Inc.; EDWARD WARD, JR, Individually and in his official capacity as Vice-President of Winnfield Life Insurance Co.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (99-CV-929)

March 1, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Evans, Jr., appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment in favor of the various defendants in this Title

VII sexual harassment and hostile work environment case. We review

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.1 The

district court’s grant of summary judgment was based on the

undisputed record evidence indicating that none of the defendants

are “employers” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964.2 North Street Boxing Club did not have the requisite

15 employees to qualify as an employer.3 Therefore those

defendants affiliated with NSBC cannot be liable. Finally Edward

Ward, Jr., had no relevant relationship with NSBC. Evans’ other

arguments are meritless.

AFFIRMED.

1 Stucky v. City of San Antonio, 260 F.3d 424, 429 (5th Cir. 2001). 2 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b). 3 Greenlees v. Eidenmuller Enterprises, Inc., 32 F.3d 197, 198 (5th Cir. 1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenlees v. Eidenmuller Enterprises, Inc.
32 F.3d 197 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
Stucky v. City of San Antonio
260 F.3d 424 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Evans v. N Street Boxing Club, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-n-street-boxing-club-ca5-2002.