Evans v. Miller
This text of Evans v. Miller (Evans v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
KRISTY ANN EVANS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-4090
DAVID EDWARD MILLER,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed October 12, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Jennifer Bass, Judge.
Kristy Ann Evans, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
Linda A. Wagner, of Middleton & Middleton, P.A., Melrose, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The former wife, Kristy Ann Evans, appeals the trial court’s order granting the
former husband’s, David Edward Miller, supplemental petition to modify timesharing, the
parenting plan, and child support. The former wife argues that we “should revisit the
issues” to determine whether the trial court properly granted the former husband’s
supplemental petition.
Because we do not have a transcript of the proceedings below, we cannot address
the former wife’s contention that the trial court’s decision on the issues is without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150,
1152 (Fla. 1979). Thus, we must affirm unless the former wife can demonstrate that
“fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order.” Murphy v. Murphy, 948
So. 2d 864, 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). The former wife has made no such showing in this
case.
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Evans v. Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-miller-fladistctapp-2018.