Evans v. . Millard
This text of 16 N.Y. 619 (Evans v. . Millard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is entirely clear that this appeal $an-not be sustained. It is not an appeal from a judgment, but from an order. It therefore is not embraced by the first subdivision of section eleven of the Code. The order does not in *612 effect determine the action; on the contrary, it allows the action to proceed, without professing to touch, by decision, the merits. The second subdivision, therefore, does not reach it. NTor is it a final order, affecting a substantial right, made upon a summary application in an action after judgment under the third subdivision. It is not final, but directs a new trial.
The appeal must therefore be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 N.Y. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-millard-ny-1858.