Evans v. McKee
This text of 25 A. 148 (Evans v. McKee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The legal title to the premises in question never was in Alex. McKee. It was claimed, however, that the equitable title was in him by reason of a resulting trust. Such trust must result from the payment of the purchase money or by a fraud in obtaining the title. It was not pretended that the money was paid by Alex. McKee, or that his money was used in the transaction. It was not disputed that Jos. McKee paid for it with his own money. Nor are we able to see that any such fraud was practiced by the latter in obtaining the title as would make him a trustee ex-maleficio.
We think the learned judge below was right in excluding the declarations of Alex. McKee made after the sheriff’s sale. The defendant’s title could not be affected in this manner.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A. 148, 152 Pa. 89, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-mckee-pa-1892.