Evans v. McCutcheon
This text of 1 N.J. Misc. 440 (Evans v. McCutcheon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think, in view of the statute (paragraphs 330 and 331, election laws, secretary of state edition), that the relator and ■his four colleagues in the petition filed August 31st, 1923, at 2:1\5 p. M., cannot be bracketed and cannot have the common designation “Regular Republican,” as pra3red by the relator. This cannot be done because, as the county clerk properly decided, that designation had alread3’ been taken by five persons who were candidates for election to the five offices in question.
The rule'will be discharged.
The same result is reached in Noonburg v. McCutcheon and also in Meier et al. v. McCutcheon.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.J. Misc. 440, 1923 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-mccutcheon-nj-1923.