Evans v. McAllister

District Court, D. Idaho·Decided May 22, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-00358·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO AUSTIN CHANCE EVANS, Case No. 2:23-cv-00358-BLW Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF V. DISMISSAL MEGANN NICOLE MCALLISTER, Defendant.

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal of this action pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A), signed by all parties who have appeared in this action (Dkt. 58), the above-captioned action is automatically terminated in its entirety with prejudice.' See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997) (dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A) is automatic, without court order).

oe DATED: May 22, 2024

Sit. iG As B. Lynn Winmill U.S. District Court Judge

‘Tt appears that the Settlement Agreement contemplates the dismissal of all litigation between the parties in this District. See Dkt. 58, Ex. A. However, the joint stipulation only refers to “the case.” Therefore, if the parties wish to dismiss any of the other lawsuits, a similar motion must be filed in each matter. ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL - 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans v. McAllister, (D. Idaho 2024).

Evans v. McAllister (Evans v. McAllister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)