Evans v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Evans v. Marshall

559 S.E.2d 165, 253 Ga. App. 439, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 276, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 96

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 24, 2002

DocketA01A2113

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 559 S.E.2d 165 (Evans v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. Marshall, 559 S.E.2d 165, 253 Ga. App. 439, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 276, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 96 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Mikell, Judge.

On June 24, 1996, Fred D. Marshall, Jr. d/b/a Parade of Homes sued his tenants, Joseph C. Evans and Erin K. Evans, to recover an unspecified sum for damages to the leased premises. The Evanses filed a timely answer. On January 18, 2001, Marshall filed an amendment to the complaint, seeking additional damages unknown to him at the time of the filing of the original suit. The Evanses did not respond to the amended complaint. On February 28, 2001, Marshall moved for the entry of default and a hearing on the issue of damages. On the same day, the trial court granted the motion, entered a default, and scheduled the matter for a trial on damages. That trial was held the next day, and it resulted in a judgment in the amount of $6,074.43. We granted the Evanses’ application for discretionary appeal.

The trial court erred in ruling that the Evanses were in default for failure to file responsive pleadings. A defendant is not required to answer an amended complaint unless ordered to do so by the trial court. OCGA § 9-11-15 (a); Random Access v. Atlanta Datacom, 232 Ga. App. 269, 270 (501 SE2d 610) (1998); Chan v. W-East Trading Corp., 199 Ga. App. 76, 79 (5) (403 SE2d 840) (1991). The Evanses were not in default, and the trial court erred by holding a trial on the issue of damages. The default order dated February 28, 2001, and the final judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Blackburn, C. J., and Pope, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mikell, Judge.

On June 24, 1996, Fred D. Marshall, Jr. d/b/a Parade of Homes sued his tenants, Joseph C. Evans and Erin K. Evans, to recover an unspecified sum for damages to the leased premises. The Evanses filed a timely answer. On January 18, 2001, Marshall filed an amendment to the complaint, seeking additional damages unknown to him at the time of the filing of the original suit. The Evanses did not respond to the amended complaint. On February 28, 2001, Marshall moved for the entry of default and a hearing on the issue of damages. On the same day, the trial court granted the motion, entered a default, and scheduled the matter for a trial on damages. That trial was held the next day, and it resulted in a judgment in the amount of $6,074.43. We granted the Evanses’ application for discretionary appeal.

The trial court erred in ruling that the Evanses were in default for failure to file responsive pleadings. A defendant is not required to answer an amended complaint unless ordered to do so by the trial court. OCGA § 9-11-15 (a); Random Access v. Atlanta Datacom, 232 Ga. App. 269, 270 (501 SE2d 610) (1998); Chan v. W-East Trading Corp., 199 Ga. App. 76, 79 (5) (403 SE2d 840) (1991). The Evanses were not in default, and the trial court erred by holding a trial on the issue of damages. The default order dated February 28, 2001, and the final judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Blackburn, C. J., and Pope, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 S.E.2d 165, 253 Ga. App. 439, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 276, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-marshall-gactapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack