Evans v. Lipscomb

28 Ga. 71
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 Ga. 71 (Evans v. Lipscomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Lipscomb, 28 Ga. 71 (Ga. 1859).

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

The only question in this case is this : If an action be pending against a single woman, and she marry, can a husband be made a party by scire facias ?

Our brother Bull decided that he could not; and he had the authority of this court for so holding.

Mr. Chitty says, “if she,” (a feme sole,) “ marry, pending an action against her, it will not abate, but the plaintiff may proceed to execution without noticing the husband.” 1 Chitty’s Pleadings, 48; 5th Amer. Ed., and citing 2 Strange 811; 4 East. 521; Cro. Jac. 523, Bacon Title Abatement G. Loft. 27; 2 Ld. Raymond, 1525. Our judiciary act of 1799, (Cobb 472,) provides that where a feme sole, “ being plaintiff,” shall marry, pending any suit, the same shall not abate by said intermarriage, but the same being suggested on record, such cause shall proceed in the name of the husband and wife.

It would be well for the Legislature to extend the provisions of the act to the case of feme sole defendants, and authorize the husbands to be made parties, not summarily upon motion, but by scire facias.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. Weller
30 Fla. 210 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Ga. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-lipscomb-ga-1859.