Evans v. Legislative Affairs Division

Fourth Circuit

Evans v. Legislative Affairs Division

548 F. App'x 72

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2013·No. No. 13-7231·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Verdell Evans, Jr. appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to the Defendant in Evans’s civil action, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Evans v. Legislative Affairs Div., No. 6:12-cv-00641-JMC (D.S.C. June 11, 2013; Feb. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Verdell Evans, Jr. appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to the Defendant in Evans’s civil action, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Evans v. Legislative Affairs Div., No. 6:12-cv-00641-JMC (D.S.C. June 11, 2013; Feb. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Evans v. Legislative Affairs Division, 548 F. App'x 72 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

548 F. App'x 72 (Evans v. Legislative Affairs Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.