Evans v. Kremer

8 F. Cas. 874
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 15, 1816
DocketCase No. 4,565
StatusPublished

This text of 8 F. Cas. 874 (Evans v. Kremer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Kremer, 8 F. Cas. 874 (circtdpa 1816).

Opinion

WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice.

That the plaintiff was not the original inventor, is a plea in bar, and if this be' the ground of de-fence, the plaintiff must come prepared to prove that-he was. Had the defendant filed a special plea on this point he need not have set out in his plea, the particular facts on which the plea was grounded, or specified the mills, where the hopper-boy had been used. Neither was it necessary for him to make such specification in his notice, when he chose to avail himself of the permission, granted by the act of congress [1 Stat. 322], of pleading the general issue, and giving the special matter in evidence. The special matter of the defence is, that the plaintiff is not the original inventor, for that the machine was known and used before the time when he claimed to be the inventor; and notice of this was sufficient, without being more specific. This was sufficient to prevent surprise, and to warn the plaintiff to be prepared to maintain his title, in relation to the question of original discovery. To go further, might lead, step by step, to introduce a degree of nicety and precision in these notices, which would be productive of great inconvenience, and would render the privilege of pleading the general issue, rather disadvantageous to the defendant, than a benefit The evidence was admitted.2

Before the opening was concluded, the plaintiff’s counsel, because of the absence of their client, suffered a nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F. Cas. 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-kremer-circtdpa-1816.