Evans v. Kennedy

Third Circuit

Evans v. Kennedy

343 F.2d 913

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 21, 1965

DocketNo. 15113

StatusPublished

This text of 343 F.2d 913 (Evans v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. Kennedy, 343 F.2d 913 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM;

The appellant, appearing pro se, has vigorously presented his contention that he has been improperly denied a preliminary injunction pursuant to his complaint against named public officials and that the trial judge exhibited disqualifying bias against him. We are satisfied that the trial judge has acted with integrity and objectivity and that the denial of a preliminary injunction represented a proper exercise of discretion.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM;

The appellant, appearing pro se, has vigorously presented his contention that he has been improperly denied a preliminary injunction pursuant to his complaint against named public officials and that the trial judge exhibited disqualifying bias against him. We are satisfied that the trial judge has acted with integrity and objectivity and that the denial of a preliminary injunction represented a proper exercise of discretion.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

343 F.2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-kennedy-ca3-1965.