Evans v. Kennedy

Third Circuit

Evans v. Kennedy

343 F.2d 913

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Evans v. Kennedy. Read the opinion of the Court — 359 F.2d 856 →

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 21, 1965·No. No. 15113·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM;

The appellant, appearing pro se, has vigorously presented his contention that he has been improperly denied a preliminary injunction pursuant to his complaint against named public officials and that the trial judge exhibited disqualifying bias against him. We are satisfied that the trial judge has acted with integrity and objectivity and that the denial of a preliminary injunction represented a proper exercise of discretion.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM;

The appellant, appearing pro se, has vigorously presented his contention that he has been improperly denied a preliminary injunction pursuant to his complaint against named public officials and that the trial judge exhibited disqualifying bias against him. We are satisfied that the trial judge has acted with integrity and objectivity and that the denial of a preliminary injunction represented a proper exercise of discretion.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Evans v. Kennedy, 343 F.2d 913 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

343 F.2d 913 (Evans v. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.