Evans v. Industrial Commission

419 P.2d 547, 4 Ariz. App. 286, 1966 Ariz. App. LEXIS 471
Court of Appeals of Arizona·Decided November 2, 1966·No. No. 1 CA-IC 96·Published

Opinion

CAMERON, Judge.

The petitioner experienced an industrial incident on 6 February 1964. He did not seek medical treatment. During a routine physical examination on 9 December 1964, his physician discovered a hernia. At the time of the examination, the petitioner did not advise his physician as to the industrial incident.

On 12 January 1965, the petitioner filed his claim with the Industrial Commission and the Commission held the hernia to not be compensable. The proper procedures were followed and this matter is before us for review.

It is our opinion that the petitioner has not brought himself within the tests set forth in Section 23-1043 A.R.S., and that the case of Morris v. Industrial Commission, [287]*2873 Ariz.App. 393, 414 P.2d 996 (1966) is not applicable to the petitioner’s claim.

The award is affirmed.

STEVENS, C. J., and DONOFRIO, J., concur. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans v. Industrial Commission, 419 P.2d 547, 4 Ariz. App. 286, 1966 Ariz. App. LEXIS 471 (Ark. Ct. App. 1966).

419 P.2d 547 (Evans v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. Industrial Commission
414 P.2d 996 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1966)