Evans v. Hughes County

Supreme Court of Dakota

Evans v. Hughes County

6 Dakota 102

Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota·Decided October 15, 1888·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

The judgment in this caséis affirmed. 1. Because the respondent had a right to lease the ferry privilege to Ledwich, the assignor of the appellant, by virtue of its police power, and in so doing did not violate the provisions of section 1889, R. S. H. S. 2. Because there was no such privity of contract existing between the parties as would enable the appellant to maintain this action against the respondent.

All of the justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

The judgment in this caséis affirmed. 1. Because the respondent had a right to lease the ferry privilege to Ledwich, the assignor of the appellant, by virtue of its police power, and in so doing did not violate the provisions of section 1889, R. S. H. S. 2. Because there was no such privity of contract existing between the parties as would enable the appellant to maintain this action against the respondent.

All of the justices concur.

Evans v. Hughes County, 6 Dakota 102 (dakotasup 1888).

Pincite

6 Dakota 102 (Evans v. Hughes County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related