Evans v. Hudson

5 Del. 366
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 5, 1852
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Del. 366 (Evans v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Hudson, 5 Del. 366 (Del. Ct. App. 1852).

Opinion

By the Court.

The plea puts in issue merely the execution of the note. Under it the plaintiff has to prove the execution of the identical paper. The attestation of the subscribing witness is prima facie evidence, upon which the paper may be read, but the jury will decide whether it is proved. If a note under seal or bond is proved, no paroi evidence can be received to change, alter or contradict it; or to show that it was for a less sum than that specified on its face. If given on a settlement between parties, it extinguishes their accounts ; they merge in the higher security; and the parties cannot afterwards abandon the note or bond, and to go into proof of the antecedent matters which constitute its consideration.

Verdict for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Del. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-hudson-delsuperct-1852.