Evans v. Hight Accessory Place

114 S.E. 70, 29 Ga. App. 128, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 102

Opinion

Stephens, J.

The evidence in this case being substantially the same as that in Hight Accessory Place v. Lam, 26 Ga. App. 163 (105 S. E. 872), which was a suit by another party against the same defendant growing out of the same transaction, and this court having held that the evidence in that case was sufficient to authorize a verdict for the plaintiff, the court erred in the instant case in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.