Evans v. Hight Accessory Place

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Evans v. Hight Accessory Place

114 S.E. 70, 29 Ga. App. 128, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 102

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 30, 1922

Docket12821

StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 70 (Evans v. Hight Accessory Place) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. Hight Accessory Place, 114 S.E. 70, 29 Ga. App. 128, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 102 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

The evidence in this case being substantially the same as that in Hight Accessory Place v. Lam, 26 Ga. App. 163 (105 S. E. 872), which was a suit by another party against the same defendant growing out of the same transaction, and this court having held that the evidence in that case was sufficient to authorize a verdict for the plaintiff, the court erred in the instant case in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

The evidence in this case being substantially the same as that in Hight Accessory Place v. Lam, 26 Ga. App. 163 (105 S. E. 872), which was a suit by another party against the same defendant growing out of the same transaction, and this court having held that the evidence in that case was sufficient to authorize a verdict for the plaintiff, the court erred in the instant case in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 S.E. 70, 29 Ga. App. 128, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-hight-accessory-place-gactapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack