Evans v. Foster

610 F. App'x 326
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 28, 2015
DocketNo. 15-6541
StatusPublished

This text of 610 F. App'x 326 (Evans v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Foster, 610 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Samuel Evans appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012). On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Evans’ informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, Evans has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 F. App'x 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-foster-ca4-2015.