Evans v. Fenty
This text of Evans v. Fenty (Evans v. Fenty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________ ) JOY EVANS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) and ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) Civil Action No. 76-293 (ESH) ) v. ) ) VINCENT GRAY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )
ORDER
Pursuant to the “2010 Revision to the 2001 Plan for Compliance and Conclusion of
Evans v. Fenty,”1 (“2010 Plan”), the Special Master, Clarence J. Sundram, has submitted four
report and recommendations regarding defendants’ compliance with three of the nine areas
specified therein: staff training, safeguarding personal possessions, and adequate budget. See
Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Staff Training-Part I, July 6, 2012
[ECF No. 1318]; Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Safeguarding
Personal Possessions, Sept. 26, 2012 [ECF No. 1336]; Special Master’s Report and
Recommendation Regarding Staff Training-Part II, Sept. 28, 2012 [ECF No. 1338]; Special
Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Adequate Budget, Oct. 5, 2012 [ECF No.
1 The 2010 Plan was filed on July 13, 2010 [ECF No. 1200], and approved on August 10, 2010 [ECF No. 1204]. 1341]. The Special Master recommends that the Court find that the defendants are in
compliance in each of these areas. During today’s status conference, the parties confirmed that
no objections would be filed with respect to any of these reports. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Special Master’s Report
and Recommendation Regarding Staff Training-Part I [ECF No. 1318], the Special Master’s
Report and Recommendation Regarding Safeguarding Personal Possessions [ECF No. 1336], the
Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Staff Training-Part II [ECF No. 1338],
and the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Adequate Budget [ECF No.
1341].
/s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge
Date: October 26, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Evans v. Fenty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-fenty-dcd-2012.