Evans v. Conley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Evans v. Conley

124 A.D.2d 981, 508 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 124 A.D.2d 981 (Evans v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. Conley, 124 A.D.2d 981, 508 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant corporation moved to vacate a default judgment entered against it in an action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal [982]*982injuries received as a result of an alleged attack by a patron in defendant’s bar. Special Term vacated the judgment finding justifiable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense. We reverse and hold that defendant failed to establish by competent evidence a justifiable excuse. By appearing pro se, defendant’s president violated CPLR 321 and her appearance was a nullity (Matter of Lefkowitz v Therapeutic Hypnosis, 52 AD2d 1017).

While defendant’s failure to serve an answer to plaintiff’s amended complaint may under the circumstances be understandable, no justifiable excuse was given why defendant again defaulted by not appearing at the inquest after notice of the hearing had been timely and properly served upon it by registered mail, return receipt requested (Passalacqua v Banat, 103 AD2d 769, appeal dismissed 63 NY2d 770; Rondout Val. Pub. Co. v AM Intl., 93 AD2d 912, 913). In view of our determination, we need not address the question of whether defendant established the existence of a meritorious defense.

All concur, except Callahan, J. P., and Schnepp, J., who dissent and vote to affirm. Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Sullivan, J. — vacate default judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: Defendant corporation moved to vacate a default judgment entered against it in an action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal [982]*982injuries received as a result of an alleged attack by a patron in defendant’s bar. Special Term vacated the judgment finding justifiable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense. We reverse and hold that defendant failed to establish by competent evidence a justifiable excuse. By appearing pro se, defendant’s president violated CPLR 321 and her appearance was a nullity (Matter of Lefkowitz v Therapeutic Hypnosis, 52 AD2d 1017).

While defendant’s failure to serve an answer to plaintiff’s amended complaint may under the circumstances be understandable, no justifiable excuse was given why defendant again defaulted by not appearing at the inquest after notice of the hearing had been timely and properly served upon it by registered mail, return receipt requested (Passalacqua v Banat, 103 AD2d 769, appeal dismissed 63 NY2d 770; Rondout Val. Pub. Co. v AM Intl., 93 AD2d 912, 913). In view of our determination, we need not address the question of whether defendant established the existence of a meritorious defense.

All concur, except Callahan, J. P., and Schnepp, J., who dissent and vote to affirm. Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Sullivan, J. — vacate default judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A.D.2d 981, 508 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-conley-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack