Evans v. Commissioners of Davidson County

114 S.E. 399, 184 N.C. 328, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 84
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 8, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 S.E. 399 (Evans v. Commissioners of Davidson County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Commissioners of Davidson County, 114 S.E. 399, 184 N.C. 328, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 84 (N.C. 1922).

Opinion

Hoke, J.

For tbe reasons stated in tbe preceding case of Barnes v. Comrs., we approve of bis Honor’s ruling that tbe restraining order be continued to tbe bearing. And for tbe additional reasons: (1) that on tbe facts as here presented it affirmatively appears that tbe voters of tbe nontax territory disapproved of tbe measure; (2) that tbe objection raised to tbe validity of tbe special tax districts in Barnes v. Comrs., ante, 325, is apparently not presented in this record for tbe reason that tbe election establishing said district was held in 1910, one year before the enactment of tbe statute, Laws 1911, cb. 135, which prohibited elections on this subject oftener than once in two years. O. S., 5533.

Tbe judgment continuing tbe restraining order to tbe bearing is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berrier v. Board of Commissioners
120 S.E. 328 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 399, 184 N.C. 328, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-commissioners-of-davidson-county-nc-1922.