Evans v. Caldera

Fourth Circuit

Evans v. Caldera

43 F. App'x 657

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 22, 2002

Docket01-2160

StatusUnpublished

This text of 43 F. App'x 657 (Evans v. Caldera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. Caldera, 43 F. App'x 657 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reginald D. Evans appeals the district court’s order setting aside the jury’s verdict and granting Appellee’s Fed.R.CivJP. 50(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Evans v. Caldera, No. CA-97-3732-3-17BC (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Reginald D. Evans appeals the district court’s order setting aside the jury’s verdict and granting Appellee’s Fed.R.CivJP. 50(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Evans v. Caldera, No. CA-97-3732-3-17BC (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 F. App'x 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-caldera-ca4-2002.