Evans v. Brown

259 S.W.2d 62, 1953 Ky. LEXIS 931
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 19, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 S.W.2d 62 (Evans v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Brown, 259 S.W.2d 62, 1953 Ky. LEXIS 931 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

STANLEY, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court granting custody of two children in a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by their father against their mother and maternal grandparents.

The father relied upon a judgment rendered April 16, 1952, by the circuit court of Warwick County, Virginia, awarding him a divorce and the custody of the children. A copy of such a judgment bearing attestation of the clerk and seal of the court was filed in the proceeding. It was not authenticated in the manner and form prescribed by the Act of Congress, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1738, or KRS 422.040, since it is not certified by the judge of the Virginia court. Compliance with this method of authentication is prerequisite where it is sought to have full faith and credit given a judgment of a court of a sister state and other evidence is not receivable. Jones v. Hodgkins, 233 Ky. 491, 26 S.W.2d 19; Allen v. Commonwealth, 272 Ky. 533, 114 S.W.2d 757. Of course, such requirement may be waived. In the present case the respondent vigorously and continuously objected to the introduction and use of the purported Virginia judgment but the court overruled the objections. That was the basis of this proceeding and the court should have sustained the objections and declined to consider the proffered copy of the judgment. The judgment awarding custody of the children under the writ will be reversed on this ground.

We may point out, however, the statement in Chamblee v. Chamblee, Ky., 248 S.W,2d 422, that where the ultimate custody of children has been theretofore adjudicated, the issue may be reopened only in a court of equity, although habeas corpus is a proper proceeding to determine immediate and temporary right to possession of children. See also Chamblee v. Rose, Ky., 249 S.W.2d 775.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 S.W.2d 62, 1953 Ky. LEXIS 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-brown-kyctapp-1953.