Evans v. Bronson

563 A.2d 318, 19 Conn. App. 571, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 304
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1989
Docket7307
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 563 A.2d 318 (Evans v. Bronson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Bronson, 563 A.2d 318, 19 Conn. App. 571, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 304 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Foti, J.

The petitioner appeals from the habeas court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, after granting the respondent’s motion to quash. The dispositive issue is whether the habeas court erred in concluding that the petitioner, who was charged with being a persistent dangerous felony [572]*572offender for a crime committed after July 1,1981, was not exposed to a sentence of life imprisonment and, therefore, not entitled to a hearing in probable cause. We find no error.

The petitioner was charged in the first part of an information with committing robbery in the first degree on or about September 30, 1983, in violation of General Statutes § 53-134. In the second part of the information, he was charged with being a persistent dangerous felony offender in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1983) § 53a-40 (a).1 The petitioner was convicted after a jury trial on both counts of the information and, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 53a-40 (f)2 [573]*573and 53a-35a,3 was sentenced to a term of twenty-five years in prison. He claims that he was entitled to a probable cause hearing pursuant to article first, section 8, of the Connecticut constitution as amended by article seventeenth of the amendments4 and General Statutes § 54-46a (a).5

A person who is charged with a crime that is “punishable by death or life imprisonment” and “who has not been indicted prior to May 26, 1983,” is entitled to a “preliminary hearing [to determine whether] there is probable cause to believe that the offense has been committed and that the accused person has committed it.” [574]*574General Statutes § 54-46a (a); Conn. Const., amend. XVII. Under this section, only a person who is exposed to a sentence of life imprisonment or death is entitled to a probable cause hearing.

The petitioner argues that a prerequisite for sentencing a persistent felony offender, pursuant to § 53a-40 (f), is that the court find that “extended incarceration and lifetime supervision will best serve the public interest.” He argues that this phrase subjects him to life “imprisonment,” and as a consequence, he was entitled to a probable cause hearing. The petitioner’s argument incorrectly equates “supervision”6 with “imprisonment,” and misconstrues the clear intent of § 53a-40 (f). We read the phrase “extended incarceration and lifetime supervision” as an expression of the legislature’s policy in enacting this statute, and therefore, not as mandating any particular sentence. Rather than imposing any particular sentence, § 53a-40 (f) merely authorizes a sentence for a class A felony and then directs the trial court to consult the applicable sentencing statute, depending on the date the offense occurred. See General Statutes §§ 53a-35a and 53a-35. Under the applicable statute in this case, the maximum prison sentence to which the petitioner was exposed was twenty-five years.

Pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-40 (f), a person who is convicted of being a persistent dangerous felony offender, either before or after July 1, 1981, may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment authorized by the applicable statutes for a class A felony. Prior to July 1, 1981, indeterminate sentencing was mandated for all felonies, and the maximum term for a class A felony, [575]*575including murder, was life imprisonment. General Statutes § 53a-35 (a) and (b).7 For crimes committed on or after July 1,1981, however, General Statutes § 53a-35a mandates definite sentencing and sets forth the current sentencing scheme. Section 53a-35a distinguishes between two types of class A felonies and provides in pertinent part: “(2) for the class A felony of murder, a term not less than twenty-five years nor more than life; (3)for a class A felony other than murder, a term not less than ten years nor more than twenty-five years . . . . ” (Emphasis added.)

Because the petitioner was convicted after July 1, 1981, General Statutes § 53a-35a is applicable to his case. Since he was convicted of a “class A felony other than murder,” the maximum prison sentence that the court could have imposed under that section was twenty-five years. Under these circumstances, the petitioner could not have received a sentence of life imprisonment or death and, therefore, no probable cause hearing was required.

There is no error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Bronson
567 A.2d 832 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 A.2d 318, 19 Conn. App. 571, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-bronson-connappct-1989.