Evans v. Boggs

2 Watts & Serg. 229
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 15, 1841
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Watts & Serg. 229 (Evans v. Boggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Boggs, 2 Watts & Serg. 229 (Pa. 1841).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Sergeant, J.

The issuing of a new execution by the plaintiff was not a waiver of his resort to the constable, if the latter had been fixed for the debt, as was decided recently by this court in the case of a sheriff, Myers v. Commonwealth, (ante 60). On the other point, however, the instruction of the court was right. Several cases have decided that the constable, notwithstanding he [230]*230has failed to comply with the injunctions of the first part of the 12th section of the Act of 1810, may, under the latter part of the same section, show that there was “ sufficient cause” for his not doing so. It may be shown by the constable that the plaintiff had no right to issue the execution, having already received the debt, or levied it by a prior execution, and this exempts the officer from liability to the plaintiff Such process, it is true, is not absolutely null and void, but it is one which is unwarrantable and improper, and which the plaintiff ought not to be permitted to derive an advantage from, as against any person whatever.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keller v. Clarke
6 Watts & Serg. 534 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1843)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Watts & Serg. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-boggs-pa-1841.