Evans v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Evans v. Barrett

69 S.E. 1083, 8 Ga. App. 612, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 74

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 24, 1911

Docket2786

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 69 S.E. 1083 (Evans v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. Barrett, 69 S.E. 1083, 8 Ga. App. 612, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 74 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell-, J.

The plaintiff in error, having proved, that the property levied upon had been exempted and was included .in a “pony” homestead set apart to her under the provisions of section 2866 of the Civil Code of 1895, was primarily and prima facie entitled to the exemption; and there being no evidence that she was not the head of a family, the justice of the peace erred in adjudging the property to be subject to the fi. fa. The certiorari should have been sustained.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell-, J.

The plaintiff in error, having proved, that the property levied upon had been exempted and was included .in a “pony” homestead set apart to her under the provisions of section 2866 of the Civil Code of 1895, was primarily and prima facie entitled to the exemption; and there being no evidence that she was not the head of a family, the justice of the peace erred in adjudging the property to be subject to the fi. fa. The certiorari should have been sustained.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 S.E. 1083, 8 Ga. App. 612, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-barrett-gactapp-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack