Evans v. Barrett
69 S.E. 1083, 8 Ga. App. 612, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 74
Opinion
The plaintiff in error, having proved, that the property levied upon had been exempted and was included .in a “pony” homestead set apart to her under the provisions of section 2866 of the Civil Code of 1895, was primarily and prima facie entitled to the exemption; and there being no evidence that she was not the head of a family, the justice of the peace erred in adjudging the property to be subject to the fi. fa. The certiorari should have been sustained.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Evans v. Barrett, 69 S.E. 1083, 8 Ga. App. 612, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 74 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
69 S.E. 1083 (Evans v. Barrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Personal Finance Co. v. Evans
163 S.E. 250 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)