Evans v. Atlantic National Bank

95 S.E. 219, 147 Ga. 621, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 74
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 13, 1918
DocketNo. 347
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 219 (Evans v. Atlantic National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. Atlantic National Bank, 95 S.E. 219, 147 Ga. 621, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 74 (Ga. 1918).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. Without special authority, an attorney can not accept anything in settlement of his client’s claim other than the full amount in cash. Civil Code (1910), § 4956; Kaiser v. Hancock, 106 Ga. 217 (32 S. E. 123).

2. Where a promissory note provides for the payment by the maker of principal, interest, and attorney’s fees, the attorney’s fees are a part of the principal debt.

3. Where a promissory note is placed by the owner and holder in the hands of an attorney for collection of the principal, interest, and attorney’s fees, and suit is brought on the note for these several items and judgment taken therefor; and where the attorney, without special authority from his client, agrees to accept the principal, interest, and costs due on the note, such agreement would not be binding upon the client, nor prevent a ft. fa. based on a judgment predicated on such note from proceeding against the maker for attorney’s fees. Even if the attorney accepted principal, interest, and costs on the ft. fa., and agreed with the maker of the note not to collect the attorney’s fees, such agreement would raise no .presumption that the attorney was authorized by his client to make such settlement. There was no allegation to the effect that there was authority on the part of the client authorizing a settlement of the ft. fa. for less than its full value by the attorney in the present ease.

4. Applying the foregoing rulings to the facts alleged in the petition, the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pembroke State Bank v. Warnell
461 S.E.2d 231 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Addley v. Beizer
423 S.E.2d 398 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Lewis v. Uselton
416 S.E.2d 94 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Bank of Early v. Broun
248 S.E.2d 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Burnett v. Johnston
165 S.E. 857 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Security Mortgage Co. v. Powers
278 U.S. 149 (Supreme Court, 1928)
Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Pattillo
140 S.E. 403 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State Bank
133 S.E. 307 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Perry v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.
2 F.2d 250 (Fifth Circuit, 1924)
Fairburn Supply Co. v. Crumley-Sharp Hardware Co.
124 S.E. 67 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. Perry
284 F. 1011 (S.D. Georgia, 1922)
Johnson v. Starr Piano Co.
108 S.E. 811 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
In re Ledbetter
267 F. 893 (N.D. Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 219, 147 Ga. 621, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-atlantic-national-bank-ga-1918.