Evans v. Adams
This text of 12 Ga. 44 (Evans v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
The question is, will a writ of error lie before there has been a final adjudication by the Court, on the grounds taken in the rule nisi1? We are clearly of the opinion that it will not. The final judgment of the Court, on the hearing of the rule nisi, may be in favor of the plaintiff in error, and then he will not be injured. The granting the rule nisi, is the mode by which the Court is to hear and determine the questions involved in it. We shall not anticipate that the Court will decide those questions erroneously. In Carter vs. Buchanan, (2 Kelly, 339,) we held, that there must be a decision, sentence, judgment, or decree, and that, quoad the subject matter of it, must not be inchoate or interlocutory, but final. In two other cases, not yet reported, we have held the same doctrine.
The writ of error in this case was prematurely sued out, and must therefore be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Ga. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-adams-ga-1852.