The inmate applicant must sign either the "Oath Beforea Notary Public" before a notary public or the "Inmate's Declaration" without a notary public. If the inmate is represented by a licensed attorney, the attorney may sign the "Oath Before a Notary Public" as petitioner and then complete "Petitioner's Information." A non-inmate applicant must sign the "Oath Before a Notary Public" before a notary public unless he is represented by a licensed attorney, in which case the attorney may sign the verification as petitioner.
A non-inmate non-attorney petitioner must sign the "Oath Before a Notary Public" before a notary public and must also complete "Petitioner's Information." An inmate petitioner must sign either the "Oath Before a Notary Public" before a notary public or the "Inmate's Declaration" without a notary public and must also complete the appropriate "Petitioner's Information,''
QATHBEFORE A:NOT^«Y PUBLIC
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF . ..
.,. ._ ._, .being duly sworn* undefcoathisays:;"! am the applicant / petitioner (circle ime) mthis action ahd^aibw the contents of the above application fbra writ ofhabeas corpus and* according to my belief,, the factsi stated^iii the application are tru'e.'>
Signature of'Applicant /Petitioner (circfeMe)
SUBSCRIBED AND SWOfcB TO BEFORE ME THIS _DAY op 20_,
Signature of Notary Public
m
Rev. 01/14/14 PETITIONER?S;iNFORMATION
Petitioner's printed name:
State bar number, if applicable:
Address: .
Telephone^
Fa*:. .
INMATE'! DECLARATiON'
I, SkiAiA//) Ll/fi/)J _^____^_j> am the(fjplicajffi/-petitioner; (Circle one) and being p^seh;tly%c&|perated.in //) C (J ~ 1~ D ^declare under penalty of perjurythat, according to my belief* the facts stated in the above applicatipn are true an^correct,
' Slgnedon \\ JjJ I ,20! ft
jAaAjm. tva/HAs ; ....•• Signaturebof(ftppiIcart^/ Petitioner (Circle one)
Rey. 031/14/14? FETITIONERfS INFORMATION
Petitioner's printed name; ., •-,,-,.- -,-..,-
Address: __i__i_i_i_ -—•„„,„,„„, •,.-v--
Telephone:
Fax: ,
on ,»2fl
Signajture pf^etiibnef
18:
•Reyj-^O1/14/14 CHRIS DANIEL Harris County District Clerk
December 9, 2014
SHAWN D. EVANS #1387198 ALLRED UNIT 2101 FM 369 NORTH IOWA PARK, TEXAS 76367
To Whom It May Concern:
Pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, please find enclosed copies of the documents indicated below concerning the Post Conviction Writ filed in cause number 1029072-A in the 338th District Court.
^ State's Original Answer'Filed December 9, 2014
• Affidavit
• Court Order Dated
I I Respondent's Proposed Order Designating Issues and Order For Filing Affidavit.
I I Respondent's Proposed Findings of Fact and Order ,
• Other
SinEereljhv
LeslieHeman3e77Der3jHy Criminal Post Trial
lah
Enclosure(s) - STATE'S ORIGINAL ANSWER
1201 Franklin • P.O. Box 4651 • Houston, Texas 77210-4651 • (888)545-5577
Page 1 of 1 Rev: 01-02-04 • B; I L j& i> Chris Dank:; District Clerk
DEC 0 &2014 CAiKFMn m?Qn7?_A Time: /-K53 Hariirf Ccrfinty, Texac / Bv ^V V £ EX PARTE § IN THE 338th DISTRuTcOURT^ $ OF
SHAWN D. EVANS, § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Applicant
STATE'S ORIGINAL ANSWER
The State of Texas, through its Assistant District Attorney for Harris County,
files this, its original answer in the above-captioned cause, having been served
with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Tex. Crim. Proc. Code
Ann. art. 11.07 §3, and would show the following:
The applicant is confined pursuant to the judgment and sentence of the >th 338 District Court of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 1029072, where the
applicant pled guilty and was convicted of the felony offense of possession of a
firearm by a felon.1 The trial court assessed punishment in accordance with the
agreed plea bargain at fifteen (15) years confinement in the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice - Institutional Division and ordered that the sentences in cause
numbers 1080203 and 1029072 run concurrently. No direct appeal was taken.
The applicant also pled guilty and was convicted ofthefelony offense ofpossession ofa deadly weapon in a penal institution in cause number 1080203. II.
The State denies the factual allegations made in the instant application,
except those supported by official court records, and offers the following
additional reply:
Reply to Applicant's Sole Ground for Relief
The applicant seems to allege he is being denied release to parole and that
his conviction does not fall under discretionary mandatory supervision.
Specifically, the applicant alleges that he does not have a case that falls under the
discretionary mandatory supervision guidelines and he was not convicted of an
offense where a deadly weapon was used. Applicant's Writ at 6. The applicant
further alleges that he is eligible for release on parole when his actual calendar
time served plus good conduct time equals one-fourth of the sentence imposed.
Applicant's Writ at 6.
An offender's eligibility for mandatory supervision is determined by
whether the offense of conviction was an eligible offense on the date it was
committed. Ex parte Mabry, 137 S.W.3d 58, 62 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Subject to
certain exceptions, a parole panel shall order the release of an inmate who is not
on parole to mandatory supervision when the actual calendar time the inmate has
served, plus any accrued good conduct time, equals the term to which the inmate, was sentenced. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §508.147(a). However, an inmate may not
be released to mandatory supervision if a parole panel determines in writing that:
(1) the inmate's accrued good conduct time is not an accurate reflection of thp
inmate's potential for rehabilitation; and (2) the inmate's release would endanger
the public. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §508.149(b). To satisfy due process, the parole
board must provide an inmate with notice that he will be considered for release
on mandatory supervision prior to the review taking place. Ex parte Geiken, 28
S.W.3d 553, 560 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). A decision under §508.149(b) is not
subject to administrative or judicial review. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §508.149(d).
The applicant committed the offense for which he is serving his sentence in
the primary case on June 1, 2005. State's Writ Exhibit "A", Judgment of
Conviction by Court - Waiver of Jury Trial in cause number 1029072. The
applicant is mistaken in his assertion that his conviction does not fall under the
discretionary mandatory supervision guidelines. To the contrary, the applicant is
eligible for Discretionary Mandatory Supervision because his conviction for
possession of a deadly weapon in a penal institution was not listed as one of the
ineligible offenses on the date the applicant committed the offense. Tex. Gov't
Code Ann. §508.149(a) (West 2001). The applicant was given notice of the
Discretionary Mandatory Supervision review on January 28, 2014. Applicant's Writ Exhibit "A", Notice of Initial Discretionary Mandatory Review. The applicant
was denied release to Discretionary Mandatory Supervision on April 14, 2014 for
the following documented reasons: (1) the record indicates the inmatP ha<:
repeatedly committed criminal episodes or has a pattern of similar offenses that
indicates a predisposition to commit criminal acts when released; (2) the inmate's
accrued good conduct time is not an accurate reflection of the inmate's potential
for rehabilitation; and (3) the inmate's release would endanger the public. State's
Writ Exhibit "&", TDO Parole Review Information for Shawn Evans, TDO Number
01387198. His next parole review date is in April, 2015. State's Writ Exhibit "B".
The applicant does not argue he was denied due process, or that the parole board
failed to follow the proper procedures in denying his release on mandatory
supervision, therefore, the applicant has failed to plead and prove facts which
would entitle him to relief. See Ex parte Rains, 555 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1976) (in order to obtain habeas corpus relief, an applicant must plead and
prove facts which entitle him to relief and he must prove his claim by a
preponderance of the evidence.)
The applicant's claim should be dismissed. The applicant raises questions of law and fact which can be resolved by the
Court of Criminal Appeals upon review of official court recorrk anrl without thp
need for an evidentiary hearing.
IV.
Service has been accomplished by sending a copy of this instrument to the
following address:
Shawn Evans TDCJ ID# 1387198 Allred Unit 2101 FM 369 North • Iowa Park, Texas 76367
SIGNED this 9th day of December, 2014.
Respectfully submitted,
Vma/^-HtC Jill Foltermann Burdette Assistant District Attorney Harris County District Attorney's Office 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 (713)755-6657 Texas Bar ID #24055492 Certificate of Compliance
The State of Texas, through its Assistant District Attorney for Harris County,
files this, its Certificate of Compliance in the above-captioned cause, having been
served with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Tex. Crim. Proc.
Code Ann art. 11.07 § 3. The State certifies that the number of words in the
State's Answer, including the Certificate of Compliance, is 996.
WlfewvAtiTA Jill Foltermann Burdette Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 (713)755-6657 (713) 755-5809 (fax) Texas Bar I'D #24055492 ft Case No. 1029072 INCIDENT NO./TRN: 9036040043-A001
The State of Texas In The 338TH District
v. Court
SHAWN K.EVANS Harris County, Texas
STATE ID NO.: TX05719222
Judgment of Conviction by Court—Waiver of Jury Trial Judge Presiding: Date Judgment Hon. BROCK THOMAS 8/15/2006 Entered: Attorney for Attorney for State: SEAN MCALISTER RANDALL AYERS Defendant: Offense for which Defendant Convicted: POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON Charging Instrument: Statute for Offense: INDICTMENT N/A Date of Offense: 6/1/2005 Degree of Offense: Plea to Offense: Findings on Deadly Weapon: 3RD DEGREE FELONY GUELTY N/A Terms of Plea Bargain:
THE 2nd ENHANCEMENT PARAGRAPH IS ABANDONED AND DISMISSED, 15 YEARS TDC Plea to 1>1Enhancement Plea to 2nd Enhancement/Habitual Paragraph: TRUE Paragraph: N/A Findings on 1" Enhancement Findings on 2nd Paragraph: TRUE Enhancement/Habitual Paragraph: N/A Date Sentence Imposed: 8/15/2006 Date Sentence to Commence: 8/15/2006 Punishment and Place of Confinement: 15 YEARS mSTrrUTIONAL DP7ISION, TDCJ THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONCURRENTLY.
Q SENTENCE OF CONFINEMENT SUSPENDED, DEFENDANT PLACED ON COMMUNITY SUPERVISION FOR N/AYEARS. . Fine: Court Costs: Restitution: Restitution Payable to: $N/A $ 226.00 $ N/A D VICTIM (see below) • AGENCY/AGENT (see below) Sex Offender Registration Requirements do not apply to the Defendant. Tex. CodeCrim. Proc. chapter 62 'oThe age of the victim at the time of the offense was N/A If Defendant is to serve sentence in TDCJ. enter incarceration periods in chronological order. 00 a From 6/1/2005 to 8/15/2006 From to From to ^Time From to From to From ,to ^Credited: If Defendant is to serve sentence in county iail or is given credit toward fine and costs, enter days credited below. © © N/A DAYS NOTES: N/A (NAll pertinent information, names and assessments indicated above are incorporated into the language of the judgment below by reference. j> This cause was called for trial inHarrisCounty, Texas. The State appeared by her District Attorney. | Counsel / Waiver of Counsel (selectone) Z;Ed Defendant appeared in person with Counsel. cD Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to representation by counsel inwriting inopen court. E Both parties announced readyfor trial. Defendant waived the right oftrial byjury and entered the plea indicated above. SThe Court then admonished Defendant asrequired by law. It appeared tothe Court thatDefendant was mentally competent to Dstand trial, made the pleafreely and voluntarily, and was aware ofthe consequences ofthis plea. The Courtreceived the plea and "gentered it of record. Having heard the evidence submitted, the Court found Defendant guilty of the offense indicated above. In the ^presence of Defendant, the Court pronounced sentence against Defendant. O EVANS 1080203.doc ™?P^ER'S MEMORANDUM at the time ofimaging The Court Finds Defendant committed the above offense and ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that Defendant is GUDLiTY of the above offense. The Court FINDS the Presentence Investigation, if so ordered, was done according to the applicable provisions of Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12 § 9. The Court ORDERS Defendant punished as indicated above. The Court Orders Defendant to pay all fines, court costs, and restitution as indicated above. Punishment Options (select one) £3 Confinement in State Jail or Institutional Division. The Court Orders the authorized agent of the State of Texas or the Sheriff of this County to take, safely convey, and deliver Defendant to the Director, Institutional Division, TDCJ. The Court ORDERS Defendant to be confined for the period and in the manner indicated above. The Court ORDERS Defendant remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of this county until the Sheriff can obey the directions of this sentence. The (Jourt ORDERS that upon release from confinement, Defendant proceed immediately to the Harris County District Clerk's office. Once there, the Court Orders Defendant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. • County Jail—Confinement/ Confinement in Lieu of Payment. The Court Orders Defendant immediately committed to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County, Texas on the date the sentence is to commence. Defendant shall be confined in the Harris County Jail for the period indicated above. The Court Orders that upon release from confinement, Defendant shall proceed immediately to the Harris County District Clerk's office. Once there, the Court ORDERSDefendant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. [~] Fine Only Payment. The punishment assessed against Defendant is for a fine only. The Court ORDERS Defendant to proceed immediately to the Office of the Harris County District Clerk. Once there, the Court ORDERSDefendant to pay or make arrangements to pay all fines and court costs as ordered by the Court in this cause. Execution / Suspension of Sentence (select one) [3 The Court Orders Defendant's sentence executed. I~l The Court Orders Defendant's sentence of confinement suspended. The Court Orders Defendant placed on community •supervision for the adjudged period (above) so long as Defendant abides by and does not violate the terms and conditions of community supervision. The order setting forth the terms and conditions of community supervision is incorporated into this judgment by reference. The Court ORDERSthat Defendant is given credit noted above on this sentence for the time spent incarcerated. Furthermore, the following special findings or orders apply:
Signed and entered on August 15, 2006
Ntc Appeal Filed:.
Mandate Received:
After Mandate Received, Sentence to Begin Date is
Received on at AM /PM
By: ! _, Deputy Sheriff of Harris County
"Appeal waived. No permission to appeal granted.1 Cu to .X • Clerk: N. LOPEZ Right Thumbprint j ©
© © rf
o o D -o o
t o EVANS 1080203.doc Page 2 of 2 9> <*'0 ""'"iffi * 5 I, Chris Daniel, District Clerk of Harris County, Texas certify that this is a true and correct copy of the original record filed and or recorded in my office, electronically or hard copy, as it appears on this date. Witness my official hand and seal of office this December 9. 2014
Certified Document Number: 24005206 Total Pages: 2
Chris Daniel, DISTRICT CLERK HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
In accordance with Texas Government Code 406.013 electronically transmitted authenticated documents are valid. If there is a question regarding the validity of this document and or seal please e-mail support@hcdistrictclerk.com IDCJ Offender Details i'vajje I of 2 TDCJ Home New Offender Search ITEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Name: EVANS,SHAVVN D SID Number: 05719222 TDCJ Number: 01387198
a r o i e it-evi
Parole Review Status ^OffenderiSs'CUirently in the Parole Review Process
The parole review process begins approximately six months before the parole eligibility date for a first review and four months before the eligibility date in additional reviews. The process begins with the offender's file being reviewed for all appropriate documents, including letters of support and protest. An Institutional Parole Officer reviews the file arid interviews the offender before preparing a case summary for the Board voting panel. The Board normally will vote on the case just prior :tothe;parole;eligibility date.
Offenders el|giblefdrimahdatbry supervision who committed an offense since September 1, 1996 are reviewed for Discretionary Mandatory Supervision (DMS). An offender who has received a Serve All vote is reviewed for possible release to ;PMSibyiavBpardpanel-prior to being released on the projected release date.
Last Parole Decision
DenaecE on 04/14/2014
DMS (04/2015)- Deny release to Discretionary Mandatory Supervision and set for next review. Denial reason(s): 9D1, 9D2, 1D
* Note: One or more of the components indicated in each paragraph may apply, but only one is required for denial (D)
1D CRIMINAL HISTORY = THE RECORD INDICATES THAT THE INMATE HAS REPEATEDLY COMMITTED CRIMINAL EPISODES OR HAS A PATTERN OF SIMILAR OFFENSES THAT INDICATES A PREDISPOSITION TO COMMIT"CRIMINAL ACTS WHEN RELEASED; OR THE RECORD INDICATES THAT THE INMATE IS A LEADER . OR ACTIVE PARTICIPANT IN GANG OR ORGANIZED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY; OR THE RECORD INDICATES A JUVENILEOR AN ADULT ARREST OR INVESTIGATION FOR FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES.
9D1 DISCRETIONARY MANDATORY SUPERVISION - THE RECORD INDICATES THAT THE INMATE'S ACCRUED GOOD CONDUCT TIME IS NOT AN ACCURATE REFLECTION OF THE INMATE'S POTENTIAL FOR REHABILITATION
9D2 DISCRETIONARYMANDATORY SUPERVISION - THE RECORD INDICATES THAT THE INMATE'S RELEASE WOULD ENDANGER THE PUBLIC.
Next Parole Review Date
httn://oftbnder,tdciiStete,tx.us/OffenderSearch/reviewDetail.action?sid=05719222&tdci 1.2/8/20M DCJ Offender Details Page 2. of2 ' *
04/2015
1 Back
For questions and comments concerning Parole Review Information, please contact the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles at 844^512^461 or:bDD-.osw(S>.tdci.texas,Qov. This information is made available to the public and law enforcement in the interest of public safety. Any unauthorized use of this information is forbidden and subject •to criminal prosecution.
The Texas Department of Criminal Justice updates this website regularly to ensure it is complete and accurate :— please be aware,:this information can change unexpectedly. This website is regenerated on working days only and the offender status information is at least 24 hours old. Therefore, details about an offender's parole review •information-may not accurately reflect "real time" status.
:~Forifechnical difficulties with the search, please email: webadmin&tdci.texas^gov and explain the problem you hare having. We will address the issue as quickly as possible.
New Offender Search TDCJ Home Page
• "#55?;
#i-fei:'Cv
"te*^-: :"ii(*W;
foltn'?//fiftenHftr;tHri ^ 19/8/0m:ilv STATE_C5_~;''\S I, Chris r***-< :£"::;Cfej^-r^County, Chris £<*;::, ~*i•••-•. ^it-* ••;.& Texas, certify that 16 H-^;"v-•/^"o'Af.^al record filed and or recorded thie In1' of^c^-.-.!•::..:•• (.^••:i^y, a\it appears on this date.
', TEXAS Deputy CHRIS DANIEL Harris County District Clerk
December 22, 2014
SHAWN K. EVANS #1387198 ALLRED UNIT 2101 FM 369 NORTH IOWA PARK, TEXAS 76367
Pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, please find enclosed copies of the documents indicated below concerning the Post Conviction Writ filed in cause number 1029072-A in the 338th District Court.
I I State's Original Answer Filed
O Respondent's Proposed Order Designating Issues and Order For Filing Affidavit.
3 Respondent's Proposed Findings of Factand Order December 17, 2014
Sineerely*
LeslieHernandez, Deput Criminal Post Trial
Enclosure(s) - STATE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND ORDER
1201 Franklin • P.O. Box 4651 • Houston, Texas 77210-4651 • (888)545-5577
Page 1 of 1 Rev: 01-02-04 JL' M. 3~t Jiy XL& Chris Daniel District Clerk
DEC 0 9 2014 Time: ^ H P3 Hlirijls Ciounty, CAUSE NO. 1029072-A Deputy ,TH EX PARTE IN THE 338m DISTRICT COURT
OF
SHAWN D. EVANS, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Applicant
STATE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
The Court has considered the application for writ of habeas corpus, the
State's Original Answer, and official court records in the above-captioned cause.
The Court finds that there are no controverted, previously unresolved facts
material to the legality of the applicant's confinement which require an
evidentiary hearing and recommends that the relief requested be denied based
on the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The applicant is confined pursuant to the judgment and sentence of the 338th District Court of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 1029072, where the applicant pled guilty and was convicted of the felony offense of possession of a firearm by a felon.
2. The applicant also pled guilty and was convicted of the felony offense of possession of a deadly weapon in a penal institution in cause number 1080203.
3. The trial court assessed punishment in accordance with the agreed plea bargain at fifteen (15) years confinement in the Texas Department of
>^ Criminal Justice - Institutional Division and ordered that the sentences in cause numbers 1080203 and 1029072 run concurrently.
4. No direct appeal was taken in the primary case.
5. No direct appeal was taken in cause number 1080203.
6. The applicant committed the offense for which he is serving his sentence in the primary case on June 1, 2005.
7. The applicant is eligible for discretionary mandatory supervision.
8. The applicant's conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon was not listed as one of the ineligible offenses on the date the applicant committed the offense.
9. The applicant was given notice of the Discretionary Mandatory Supervision review on January 28, 2014.
10. The applicant was denied release to Discretionary Mandatory Supervision on April 14, 2014.
11. The board made the following documented reasons for the denial of applicant's release to discretionary mandatory supervision: (1) the inmate has repeatedly committed criminal episodes or has a pattern of similar offenses that indicates a predisposition to commit criminal acts when released; (2) the inmate's accrued good conduct time is not an accurate reflection of the inmate's potential for rehabilitation; and (3) the inmate's release would endanger the public.
12. The applicant's next parole review date is April, 2015.
13. The applicant does not allege he was denied due process.
14. The applicant does not allege that the parole board failed to follow the proper procedures in denying his release on mandatory supervision. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The applicant's eligibility for mandatory supervision is determined by whether the offense of conviction was an eligible offense on the date it was committed. Ex parte Mabry, 137 S.W.3d 58, 62 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).
2. The applicant is eligible for discretionary mandatory supervision because his conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon was not listed as one of the ineligible offenses on June 1, 2005. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §508.149(a) (West 2001).
3. Subject to certain exceptions, a patrol panel shall order the release of an inmate who is not on parole to mandatory supervision when the actual calendar time the inmate has served, plus any accrued good conduct time, equals the term to which the inmate was sentenced. Tex. Gov't Code. Ann. §508.147(a).
4. An inmate may not be released to mandatory supervision if a parole panel determines in writing that: (1) the inmate's accrued good conduct time is not an accurate reflection of the inmate's potential for rehabilitation; and (2) the inmate's release would endanger the public. Tex. Gov't Code Ann §508.149(b).
5. The applicant was provided due process because he was given notice that he would be considered for release on mandatory supervision prior to the review taking place. Ex parte Geiken, 28 S.W.3d 553, 560 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).
6. The parole board's decision to deny the applicant release on mandatory supervision is not subject to administrative or judicial review. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §508.149(d).
7. The applicant fails to plead and prove facts which would entitle him to habeas corpus relief because he does not allege he was denied due process, or that the parole board failed to follow the proper procedures in denying his release on mandatory supervision. Ex parte Rains, 555 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976).
8. In all things, the applicant fails to prove his conviction and sentence were improperly obtained, or that he is being improperly confined.
Accordingly, it is recommended to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that the
instant application for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed and that all requested
habeas relief be denied.
ORDER
THE CLERK IS ORDERED to prepare a transcript of all papers in cause
number 1029072-A and transmit same to the Court of Criminal Appeals as
provided by Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Ann art. 11.07. The transcript shall include
certified copies of the following documents:
1. The application for writ of habeas corpus;
2. The State's Answer;
3. The Court's order
4. The indictment, judgment and sentence, and the docket sheets in cause
number 1029072;
5. State's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order; and
6. The applicant's Proposed Findings of Fact (if any). THE CLERK is further ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the applicant,
Shawn Evans, TDCJ ID#1387198 Allred Unit, 2101 FM 369 North, Iowa Park, Texas
76367; and to counsel for the State, Jill F. Burdette, 1201 Franklin, Suite 600,
Houston, Texas 77002.
By the following signature, the Court adopts the State's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order in Cause Number 1029072-A.
Signed on the f^ day of ^^^^ f2014. ™/r> '.0 ' *- • '.\ \Y,r\s P^nnty, Texas, certify that ••thiKj.y • A \ " £>: V^'record filed and or recorded Injv #.••';:, ! ,/. V • .---V- filand setriofoffice rc3imi.i-.~!-rvreiH!,and WltnacsS setriof( this 1mTrJniUf g e STRiifSSrtfT TEXAS .Deputy CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned counsel certifies that I have served a copy of the "State's
Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order in cause number
1029072-A to the applicant on December 9, 2014 by mail as follows:
Shawn Evans TDCJ ID#1387198 Allred Unit 2101 FM 369 North Iowa Park, Texas 76367
FILE® t'W/vcUfti Jill Foltermann Burdette DECY92JM Assistant District Attorney Harris County District Attorney's Office 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 755-6657 Texas BarID#24055492
\'-, - •>.
1^1 ST/" "^"SU/.. "V cc/; / \ c -d^^/X I, C!.' •'"' / A ' '~fa.:-fpod&rd filed and or recorded Inmy/LiO / A .:•.'copy^a igppiare on this date. Wltr^uW^X^.'ii-tT^iii'ariG^sal 6f arflc#,thl8 i^m^im ) zu — CHF$S % s^y