Evans ex rel. Evans v. Unknown Agents of the Department of Children & Families

278 F. App'x 935
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 2008
DocketNo. 07-12848
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 F. App'x 935 (Evans ex rel. Evans v. Unknown Agents of the Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans ex rel. Evans v. Unknown Agents of the Department of Children & Families, 278 F. App'x 935 (11th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed, although on grounds different from those relied upon by the district court. We need not address whether or not, or to what extent, any of the defendants are protected by absolute immunity, because we conclude that all defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. The allegations of the complaint set out ample justification for the actions taken by each of the defendants. To the extent that the complaint alleges actions which might have been actionable — e.g., the allegations of reliance upon false evidence — the allegations of the complaint are purely conclusory, without any support in specific factual allegations. Accordingly, we conclude that none of the defendants committed any constitutional violation, and we readily conclude that all of the defendants are protected by qualified immunity.

AFFIRMED.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayes v. Narang
N.D. Illinois, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 F. App'x 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-ex-rel-evans-v-unknown-agents-of-the-department-of-children-ca11-2008.