Evans Elkhorn Coal Co. v. Ousley

388 S.W.2d 130, 1965 Ky. LEXIS 416
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMarch 12, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 388 S.W.2d 130 (Evans Elkhorn Coal Co. v. Ousley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans Elkhorn Coal Co. v. Ousley, 388 S.W.2d 130, 1965 Ky. LEXIS 416 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

CHARLES M. ALLEN, Special Commissioner.

This is an appeal from an order of the Floyd Circuit Court. allowing the appellees to redocket the case for further proceedings, the order having been entered approximately sixteen months after the entry of an order dismissing the complaint and striking the case from the docket.

Counsel for appellants frankly admit that they have grave doubts as to whether or not the order redocketing is appealable. Their doubts are well founded since KRS 21.060(1) specifically states that appeals can he taken to the Court of Appeals as a matter of right from all final orders and judgments of circuit courts in civil cases with certain exceptions.

CR 54.01 provides in part that a final or appealable judgment is a final order adjudicating all the rights of all the parties in an action or proceeding or a judgment made final under Rule 54.02.

The order of the Floyd Circuit Court redocketing the case did not in any way adjudicate the rights of the parties and was in no way a final order adjudicating their final rights. As stated in Brumley v. Lewis, Ky., 340 S.W.2d 599, the final and appealable character of an order should be tested on the basis of whether the order grants or denies the ultimate relief sought in the action or requires further steps to be taken in order that the parties’ rights may [131]*131be finally determined. In this action the order redocketing obviously requires further steps to be taken in order that the parties’ rights may be further determined.

The appeal is dismissed.

The opinion is approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Hospitality Resources, Inc.
276 S.W.3d 775 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2008)
Chicago Insurance Co. v. Travelers Insurance Co.
967 S.W.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1997)
The Lexington Herald-Leader Co. v. Beard
690 S.W.2d 374 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 S.W.2d 130, 1965 Ky. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-elkhorn-coal-co-v-ousley-kyctapp-1965.