Evans, Crystal L. v. Schnellecke Logistics USA, LLC

CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJuly 2, 2026
Docket2026-10-0780
StatusPublished

This text of Evans, Crystal L. v. Schnellecke Logistics USA, LLC (Evans, Crystal L. v. Schnellecke Logistics USA, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans, Crystal L. v. Schnellecke Logistics USA, LLC, (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

FILED Jul 02, 2026 01:42 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT CHATTANOOGA

Crystal L. Evans, Docket No. 2026-10-0780 Employee, v. Schnellecke Logistics USA, LLC, State File No. 82584-2025 Employer, And Great American Insurance Group, Judge Audrey Headrick Carrier.

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

Ms. Evans asked that Schnellecke pay for unauthorized medical treatment and temporary disability benefits after her termination. Schnellecke denied her request, asserting that it authorized treatment and terminated her for cause. For the reasons below, the Court holds Ms. Evans is not entitled to the requested benefits at this time.

Claim History

On November 20, 2025, Ms. Evans injured her back and right leg from tripping over an electrical cord. After her injury, Schnellecke authorized treatment with five panel-selected physicians.

First, Ms. Evans sought authorized care at a walk-in clinic, where she received a steroid injection, prescription, and work restrictions. Days later, Ms. Evans returned to the clinic, and the doctor referred her to an orthopedist.

Before seeing an orthopedist, Ms. Evans stated she went to the emergency room because of her “severely swollen leg.” She did not submit that record.

In December, Ms. Evans saw her second authorized physician, orthopedist Dr. Benjamin Miller, for her knee. He ordered an MRI and kept Ms. Evans on restricted

1 duty until her evaluation by a spine specialist.

In early January, Ms. Evans returned to the emergency room the night before her scheduled appointment with Dr. Michael Calfee, spine orthopedist, and the third authorized physician. She did not introduce that record.

Ms. Evans saw Dr. Calfee the day after her emergency room visit, and he concluded that her work injury caused radiculopathy. He ordered physical therapy and an EMG/NCS, kept her on restricted duty, and referred her to a spine surgeon.

Ms. Evans sought emergency treatment again before her next appointment with Dr. Calfee after experiencing incontinence. She underwent another lumber MRI, which showed a new central disc extrusion at L4-5 when compared to her older MRIs. Ms. Evans returned to Dr. Calfee and reported seeking emergency treatment for incontinence, but he did not think her lumbar condition caused it. He also noted her EMG/NCS revealed normal findings. Dr. Calfee kept her on restricted duty, released her to return as needed, and referred her to a spine specialist.

In February, Ms. Evans saw Dr. Benjamin Weisenthal, the fourth authorized doctor and a spine surgeon. Dr. Weisenthal reviewed her 2023 and 2025 lumbar MRIs and concluded she had a small central disc bulge at L4-5 without significant stenosis. He also said her low-back and right-leg pain did not match her clinical symptoms. Dr. Weisenthal ordered an injection and released her without restrictions. He said he had nothing else to offer. Dr. Weisenthal later placed Ms. Evans at maximum medical improvement and did not anticipate the need for future treatment.

In March, Ms. Evans’s primary care physician ordered a knee MRI, which showed a strained calf muscle.

In April, Ms. Evans saw the fifth authorized physician, Dr. Charles Benson, another orthopedic surgeon, for a second opinion on her knee. Dr. Benson diagnosed right-knee internal derangement and quadriceps muscle strain, ordered crutches and physical therapy, and requested images of her previous knee MRI.

The records do not show whether Ms. Evans returned to see Dr. Benson. However, on May 22, Dr. Benson placed Ms. Evans at maximum medical improvement, noting he did not anticipate the need for future treatment.

Schnellecke terminated Ms. Evans three months after her work injury for 2 violating its attendance policy. Shayna Kunselman, Human Resources Manager, testified Ms. Evans received policy training in August 2025. Most of Ms. Evans’s attendance problems involved clocking in late. Ms. Kunselman stated that Ms. Evans received a “counseling” warning, a written warning, and a final warning before it terminated her. She stated that Schnellecke also documented performance problems. Moreover, Chantelle Meess, Safety Manager, testified by affidavit that Schnellecke accommodated Ms. Evans’s work restrictions until her termination.

Ms. Evans argued that Schnellecke delayed and denied her medical care, which forced her to treat on her own. She continues treating on her own because she remains in pain, and she plans to see a neurosurgeon in July.

Schnellecke acknowledged denying the treatment Ms. Evans sought on her own during the same time she was receiving authorized care. Schnellecke argued it terminated Ms. Evans for violation of its attendance policy.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Evans must prove a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits that she is entitled to the requested benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

First, the Court considers Ms. Evans’s request for payment of unauthorized treatment. An employer may risk being required to pay for unauthorized treatment if it does not offer the treatment made reasonably necessary by the work injury as required by subsection 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). Young v. Young Elec. Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *16 (May 25, 2016).

Here, Schnellecke offered Ms. Evans five panels and never denied any authorized medical treatment. The records do not show any delays. Ms. Evans sought emergency care multiple times, and she also treated with her primary care physician while simultaneously receiving authorized treatment. She did not submit the medical records or bills. Likewise, Ms. Evans did not offer any expert opinion that the treatment she obtained was related to work, reasonable and necessary, or that the charges were usual and customary. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(12); Eaves v. Ametek, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 53, at *8 (Sept. 14, 2018). Therefore, the Court finds that Ms. Evans is unlikely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in her request for payment of unauthorized medical treatment.

3 Next, Ms. Evans asked for temporary partial disability benefits. Temporary partial disability refers to the time during which an injured employee can resume some gainful employment but has not reached maximum recovery. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015).

Schnellecke relied on Marvin Windows of Tennessee v. Gardner, No. WC2011-01479-WC-R3-WC, 2012 Tenn. LEXIS 403, at *9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel June 8, 2012), arguing that an employer can still enforce workplace rules even though an employee is due temporary disability benefits. So, a termination due to a violation of workplace rules may relieve an employer of its obligation to furnish temporary disability benefits if the termination was related to the workplace violation. To be related, the Court must find “(1) that the actions allegedly precipitating the employee’s dismissal qualified as misconduct under established or ordinary workplace rules and/or expectations; and (2) that those actions were, as a factual matter, the true motivation for the dismissal.” Id. at *9- 10.

Schnellecke offered proof showing it terminated Ms. Evans for violation of its attendance policy, including its written policy, Ms. Evans’s clock-in and -out times, and write-ups leading up to her termination. Likewise, Schnellecke confirmed it accommodated Ms.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239
§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Evans, Crystal L. v. Schnellecke Logistics USA, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-crystal-l-v-schnellecke-logistics-usa-llc-tennworkcompcl-2026.