Evans Co v. Bryson

91 S.E. 71, 146 Ga. 278, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 708
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 14, 1916·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

An agent sold certain shares of stock without complying with the act of 1913 (Acts 1913, p. 117), taking.a negotiable note therefor. The note was negotiated for value, before maturity, to an innocent purchaser who brought suit against the maker. The maker pleaded that the note, having been given in violation of the act, was, under the eighth section thereof, void, and that the plaintiff, notwithstanding he acquired a title to the note for value and before maturity, could not. [279] recover. Held, that under the eighth section of.the act such sale is voidable and not void, and the plea was not meritorious.

December 14, 1916. Complaint. Before Judge Littlejohn. Stewart superior court. December 27, 1915. ■ R. 8. Wimberly and T. T. James, for plaintiff. G. 7. Harrell, for defendant.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans Co v. Bryson, 91 S.E. 71, 146 Ga. 278, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 708 (Ga. 1916).

91 S.E. 71 (Evans Co v. Bryson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fleming v. Fox Furnace Co.
176 S.E. 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Gleaton v. Bank of Arlington
149 S.E. 438 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Ashley & Rumelin v. Brady
238 P. 314 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1925)
Niemeyer v. Dougan
119 S.E. 544 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)