Evanoff, Robert Keith
This text of Evanoff, Robert Keith (Evanoff, Robert Keith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-76,760-05
EX PARTE ROBERT KEITH EVANOFF, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR13218A IN THE 266TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ERATH COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of drug possession
and sentenced to imprisonment. He was later released to parole.
While on parole, Applicant was arrested for drug possession, and he bonded out of the county
jail. A parole revocation (a/k/a “blue”) warrant was later executed, and Applicant was arrested and
held in the county jail on the blue warrant. A preliminary revocation hearing was held, the hearing
officer found that “adequate grounds exist[ed] to find that [Applicant] violated the conditions of
release,” and the decision was to proceed to a final parole revocation hearing. According to 2
Applicant, through habeas counsel, the new drug-possession charges have never been filed, and he
is still being held in the county jail pursuant to the blue warrant, but he has never received a final
parole revocation hearing, although he has repeatedly requested one. See TEX . GOV ’T CODE
508.282(a)(1)(A)-(B).
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances,
additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order
the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to file an affidavit
addressing the issue of whether the Parole Board is timely providing Applicant with a final parole
revocation hearing. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to
Applicant’s claims, and the trial court may make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law
that it deems relevant.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: June 12, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Evanoff, Robert Keith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evanoff-robert-keith-texcrimapp-2019.