Evangelista v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Evangelista v. City of Rochester

6 A.D.3d 1140, 775 N.Y.S.2d 655, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6128

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.3d 1140 (Evangelista v. City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evangelista v. City of Rochester, 6 A.D.3d 1140, 775 N.Y.S.2d 655, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an amended judgment (denominated amended order) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered October 9, 2002 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The amended judgment dismissed the petition to prohibit respondents from denying members of the Rochester [1141]*1141Police Locust Club, Inc. the right to counsel or a union representative during criminal investigations.

It is hereby ordered that the amended judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., RJ., Green, Scudder and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an amended judgment (denominated amended order) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered October 9, 2002 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The amended judgment dismissed the petition to prohibit respondents from denying members of the Rochester [1141]*1141Police Locust Club, Inc. the right to counsel or a union representative during criminal investigations.

It is hereby ordered that the amended judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., RJ., Green, Scudder and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 1140, 775 N.Y.S.2d 655, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evangelista-v-city-of-rochester-nyappdiv-2004.