Evangelina Knandel v. Michael Edghill and Shirelle Edghill
This text of Evangelina Knandel v. Michael Edghill and Shirelle Edghill (Evangelina Knandel v. Michael Edghill and Shirelle Edghill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-23-00596-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
EVANGELINA KNANDEL, Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL EDGHILL AND SHIRELLE EDGHILL, Appellees.
ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva
On December 28, 2023, appellant filed a notice of appeal. On January 10, 2024,
the Clerk of the Court requested appellant to remit a $205.00 filing fee. On February 5,
2024, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant she was delinquent in remitting a $205.00 filing fee. The Clerk of the Court further notified appellant the appeal was subject to
dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of the letter. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.3 (b), (c).
On March 6, 2024, we abated the matter for the trial court to determine appellant’s
indigency status and whether appellant was entitled to proceed without the payment of
fees. On April 30, 2024, the Clerk of the Court spoke with the trial court judge, the
Honorable Timothy McCoy, who indicated an indigency hearing had been set and no one
appeared. Accordingly, on that same day, the case was reinstated, and the Clerk of the
Court again notified appellant she was delinquent in remitting a $205.00 filing fee. The
Clerk of the Court further notified appellant the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing
fee was not paid within ten days from the date of the letter. See id.
Appellant has not paid the filing fee nor otherwise responded to the notice from the
Clerk of the Court requiring a response or other action within the time specified;
accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.
CLARISSA SILVA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 25th day of July, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Evangelina Knandel v. Michael Edghill and Shirelle Edghill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evangelina-knandel-v-michael-edghill-and-shirelle-edghill-texapp-2024.