Evan Elon Webber v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Evan Elon Webber v. the State of Texas

DecidedMarch 23, 2023

Docket03-21-00574-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Evan Elon Webber v. the State of Texas (Evan Elon Webber v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evan Elon Webber v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 23, 2023

NO. 03-21-00572-CR

Evan Elon Webber, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, THEOFANIS, AND JONES AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00573-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, THEOFANIS, AND JONES AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00574-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, THEOFANIS, AND JONES AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 23, 2023

NO. 03-21-00572-CR

Evan Elon Webber, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, THEOFANIS, AND JONES AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00573-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, THEOFANIS, AND JONES AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00574-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, THEOFANIS, AND JONES AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Evan Elon Webber v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evan-elon-webber-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.