Evalenko v. Catts
154 N.E. 627, 243 N.Y. 613, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 901
Opinions
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and LEHMAN, JJ. Dissenting: HISCOCK, Ch. J., McLAUGHLIN and ANDRFWS, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Evalenko v. Catts, 154 N.E. 627, 243 N.Y. 613, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 901 (N.Y. 1926).
154 N.E. 627 (Evalenko v. Catts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.