Evah D. Gonzales v. James M. Dykes and Sharon Bado Dykes
This text of Evah D. Gonzales v. James M. Dykes and Sharon Bado Dykes (Evah D. Gonzales v. James M. Dykes and Sharon Bado Dykes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-16-00042-CV
EVAH D. GONZALES APPELLANT
V.
JAMES M. DYKES AND SHARON APPELLEES BADO DYKES
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-000012-2
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On March 11, 2016, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk
responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that
payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as
required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s
record and provided this court with proof of payment.
Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s
record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want
of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
37.3(b), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: April 7, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Evah D. Gonzales v. James M. Dykes and Sharon Bado Dykes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evah-d-gonzales-v-james-m-dykes-and-sharon-bado-dykes-texapp-2016.