Evah D. Gonzales v. James M. Dykes and Sharon Bado Dykes

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 7, 2016·No. 02-16-00042-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00042-CV

EVAH D. GONZALES APPELLANT V.

JAMES M. DYKES AND SHARON APPELLEES BADO DYKES

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-000012-2

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On March 11, 2016, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. DELIVERED: April 7, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evah D. Gonzales v. James M. Dykes and Sharon Bado Dykes, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Evah D. Gonzales v. James M. Dykes and Sharon Bado Dykes (Evah D. Gonzales v. James M. Dykes and Sharon Bado Dykes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.