Eva Rehner v. Baxter Rice, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California
This text of 717 F.2d 492 (Eva Rehner v. Baxter Rice, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eva REHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Baxter RICE, Individually and as Director of the Department
of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of
California, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 77-2409.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1983.
Decided Oct. 3, 1983.
Stephan V. Quesenberry, Seattle, Wash., Art Bunce, Escondido, Cal., Indian Legal Services, for Rehner.
William R. Winship, Jr., Alan S. Meth, San Diego, Cal., argued, for Rice; Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., on brief.
Before BROWNING, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, CANBY, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
In accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Rice v. Rehner, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3291, 77 L.Ed.2d 961 (U.S.1983), reversing and remanding 678 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir.1982), the judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
717 F.2d 492, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eva-rehner-v-baxter-rice-individually-and-as-director-of-the-department-ca9-1983.