Eva Hines v. Royal Indemnity Company

Sixth Circuit

Eva Hines v. Royal Indemnity Company

244 F.2d 959, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3194

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 3, 1957

Docket12987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 F.2d 959 (Eva Hines v. Royal Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eva Hines v. Royal Indemnity Company, 244 F.2d 959, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3194 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sought by her complaint to recover from the appellee, Royal Indemnity Company, payment of a judgment recovered by her against appellee’s insured for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident caused by the negligent operation of the insured automobile. The District Judge sustained appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed appellant’s complaint for failure of the insured or the appellant to give notice to the appellee of the accident until approximately twenty-three months after the accident and for failure of the insured to cooperate with the insurer. The policy required written notice to be given to the insurer as soon as practicable after the accident.

For the reasons given by the District Judge in his opinion reported at D.C., 141 F.Supp. 234, and on the basis of the authorities cited therein, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sought by her complaint to recover from the appellee, Royal Indemnity Company, payment of a judgment recovered by her against appellee’s insured for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident caused by the negligent operation of the insured automobile. The District Judge sustained appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed appellant’s complaint for failure of the insured or the appellant to give notice to the appellee of the accident until approximately twenty-three months after the accident and for failure of the insured to cooperate with the insurer. The policy required written notice to be given to the insurer as soon as practicable after the accident.

For the reasons given by the District Judge in his opinion reported at D.C., 141 F.Supp. 234, and on the basis of the authorities cited therein, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 F.2d 959, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eva-hines-v-royal-indemnity-company-ca6-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack