EVA CURIK v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, ETC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

EVA CURIK v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, ETC.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 4, 2020

Docket19-2779

StatusPublished

This text of EVA CURIK v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, ETC. (EVA CURIK v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, ETC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

EVA CURIK v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, ETC., (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

EVA CURIK, Appellant,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 4D19-2779

[June 4, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18- 7821 (11).

Eva Curik, Deerfield Beach, pro se.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman, LLP, Tallahassee, William P. Heller, Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Eric M. Levine of Akerman LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 1

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC20-23, Amendment 2 (the requirement in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) for the clerk to issue a writ of possession “forthwith” remains suspended) and Executive Order 20-137 (extending, until 12:01 a.m. on July 1, 2020, Executive Order 20-94, which suspends and tolls any statute providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of action under Florida law). We trust any motions directed to those orders shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

EVA CURIK, Appellant,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 4D19-2779

[June 4, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18- 7821 (11).

Eva Curik, Deerfield Beach, pro se.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman, LLP, Tallahassee, William P. Heller, Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Eric M. Levine of Akerman LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 1

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC20-23, Amendment 2 (the requirement in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) for the clerk to issue a writ of possession “forthwith” remains suspended) and Executive Order 20-137 (extending, until 12:01 a.m. on July 1, 2020, Executive Order 20-94, which suspends and tolls any statute providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of action under Florida law). We trust any motions directed to those orders shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our mandate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

EVA CURIK v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, ETC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eva-curik-v-jp-morgan-chase-bank-etc-fladistctapp-2020.