Eutaw Ice, Water & Power Co. v. McGee
This text of 76 So. 990 (Eutaw Ice, Water & Power Co. v. McGee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record fails to show that any citation or notice of appeal was issued or served upon any adverse party as required by Code, § 28S1, and no appearance is entered in this court by or for any one as appellee. There is not before this court any adverse party against whom judgment could be rendered in the event of a reversal. Miller v. Parker, 47 Ala. 312. Therefore, under authority of section 28S1 of the Code, Williams v. Harper, 95 Ala. 610, 10 South. 327, and Frierson v. Haley, 1 Ala. App. 576, 55 South. 429, and authorities there cited, the appeal in this cause must be dismissed. But on the merits, see Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Carrie Brooks, ante, p. 209, 76 South. 515, and Ex parte Brooks, 200 Ala. 697, 76 South. 995.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 So. 990, 16 Ala. App. 258, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eutaw-ice-water-power-co-v-mcgee-alactapp-1917.