Eustace v. the Evergreens
196 N.E. 560, 267 N.Y. 523, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1260
This text of 196 N.E. 560 (Eustace v. the Evergreens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eustace v. the Evergreens, 196 N.E. 560, 267 N.Y. 523, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1260 (N.Y. 1935).
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. There "was evidence which presented a question of fact for the jury as to negligence and contributory negligence. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
196 N.E. 560, 267 N.Y. 523, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eustace-v-the-evergreens-ny-1935.