Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Eustace v. State

Eustace v. State

242 So. 3d 1205
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 4, 2018
DocketCase No. 5D17–2465
StatusPublished

This text of 242 So. 3d 1205 (Eustace v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eustace v. State, 242 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm but remand for correction of a scrivener's error. See Daniels v. State , 200 So.3d 195, 196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). The trial court orally dismissed the condition (9) violation but the written order states otherwise. Accordingly, we remand this cause for correction of the order.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beau Daniels v. State
200 So. 3d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 So. 3d 1205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eustace-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.