Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Eustace v. State

Eustace v. State

242 So. 3d 1205
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 4, 2018·No. Case No. 5D17–2465·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm but remand for correction of a scrivener's error. See Daniels v. State , 200 So.3d 195, 196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). The trial court orally dismissed the condition (9) violation but the written order states otherwise. Accordingly, we remand this cause for correction of the order.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eustace v. State, 242 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

242 So. 3d 1205 (Eustace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beau Daniels v. State
200 So. 3d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)