Eustace Nathaniel Hall v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

81 F.3d 149, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13975, 1996 WL 155986
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 29, 1996
Docket95-1964
StatusUnpublished

This text of 81 F.3d 149 (Eustace Nathaniel Hall v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eustace Nathaniel Hall v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 81 F.3d 149, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13975, 1996 WL 155986 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

81 F.3d 149

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eustace Nathaniel HALL, Petitioner,
v.
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 95-1964.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 21, 1996.
Decided: March 29, 1996.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. (A43-723-353)

Eustace Nathaniel Hall, Petitioner Pro Se. William Joseph Howard, Karen Anne Herrling, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

B.K.A.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Eustace Hall petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal and ordering his deportation. Since filing the petition, Hall has left the country under a legally executed order of deportation. The respondent, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, has filed a motion to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Because this court lacks jurisdiction to review an order of deportation once an alien has been legally deported, we grant the motion to dismiss. 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(c) (1988); Joehar v. INS, 957 F.2d 887, 889-90 (D.C.Cir.1992).

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 F.3d 149, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13975, 1996 WL 155986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eustace-nathaniel-hall-v-us-immigration-naturalization-service-ca4-1996.