Eury v. Sandstrom

23 F. App'x 172
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 9, 2002·No. No. 01-7663·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S .C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eury v. Sandstrom, 23 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2002).

23 F. App'x 172 (Eury v. Sandstrom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)